I used to edit for ePregnancy.com and I’m thinking it was three-ish years ago that I was putting out calls for submission for them. This is pretty much the same audience, pay-wise (experienced writers who can toss off the content pretty easily and don’t mind the low pay and new writers who are excited about getting more than a byline) but the submissions I’m getting are substantially worse. I think this has to do with more writing opportunities on-line. On the one hand, this is great for the pocketbook of new writers but on the other hand it means that the writing they’re doing doesn’t benefit them career-wise. A lot of these sites, like Associated Content, don’t ask writers to query and I don’t think there’s any editorial give-and-take so writers never need to learn how to target a pitch or direct content for a specific audience. (Hey, I paid my dues on Suite101 writing absolute crap — truly, and google will prove it much to my dismay — for fifteen bucks a month and I counted myself lucky! I know how it is.) And then it looks like a lot of the writers I’m hearing from seem to have done (from scanning their clips) a lot of work for search engine optimization sites where quality is secondary to getting the right search terms embedded in the content.
Now just in case any writers are coming in here after seeing my call for submissions (and personally if I don’t know anything about an editor or a publication, I look at the publication and then I google the editor), I’m going to give them some tips:
It’s kinda shocking to me when I say, “I would need to see a specific query” and mroe than one writer replies with, “What’s a query?” Truly, it’s happening in higher numbers than I ever got at ePregnancy. Specifically I’m dismayed for these writers who are surely (at least some of them) talented and dedicated and excited about having a writing career. All it takes is a little preparation — and my gosh, writing sites are out there by the dozens so the research just isn’t that hard.
Take home lesson in this: I am hungry for decent queries that showcase good writing. And if you’re a friend of mine — i.e., blog reader — you don’t even need to be all that formal. Like I said, I’ll work with someone whose email shows thoughtful talent even if the pitch is slightly off-base. (Frankly, we’re revamping the content so much that we’re not even quite sure what we’re looking for but it’s not, “I’m not just a writer. I am also a woman who loves to read so I would like to offer you my weekly book column pasted below.”)
Oh and in the most — ahem — confident writer category: The person who pitched me a dozen ideas, all of them too broad to be written effectively at our word count, and responded to my rejection with, “I can deliver them at 500 words. So do you want them all then?” Ummm, no.
I have two kids and a delightfully odd husband, Brett. My children are Noah (born to us in 1997) and Madison (born to her first mom, Pennie, in 2004 and brought to our family through a domestic, open adoption). They are my inspiration and also the reason I don't get more done around here.
I'm a writer and sometimes I get published, which is a nice thing. I write for joy, I write for money and when I'm very lucky, both things happen at the same time. My work appears in national publications including Yoga Journal, Disney's Family.com, Utne, Wondertime, Brain Child and Salon. Currently I am working on a book about my daughter's adoption and seeking representation for the proposal. I also own Smart Cookie Communications with my husband.
Susan
March 1st, 2007 at 10:35 pm
Wait, where is your call for submissions? What are you editing for? I feel dummmmmb….sorry I’m out of it!
kim.kim
March 1st, 2007 at 10:53 pm
So you don’t want my dozen ideas in 500 word format??
Oh.
Then you might want to ignore my last email then : - (
I had a really good idea about how lighting a cigarette at the bus stop makes the bus come quicker……….
Back to my day job then *sigh*
Julie
March 1st, 2007 at 11:06 pm
Hmm. This sounds very much like what I deal with in my high school publications, just at a higher level. I wonder if our evolving technology has exposed us to so much media–and brought us “closer” to so many pros through their blogs, etc.–that some of us feel like we’re capable of the exact same quality without really putting any time into learning the ropes, first.
And, of course, there’s that specialness syndrome that I have to deal with. You know, lots of kids are reinforced that they are special gifts to the world.
Are many of these writers young, you think?
molly_o
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:01 am
As an editor I’ve encountered every one of these! Thank you for laying it out so plainly.
Andrea
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:54 pm
Is this related to the call you posted below?
Oh, dear.
Lisa Gates
March 5th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Hi Dawn,
Thanks to Deb Ng I found your lovely blog.
I just had an exchange with the editor on email. It was a flurry of story ideas until we arrived at one or two. I don’t think it would have happened so easily had the exchange not started with an idea, and a specific story suggestion.
Here’s my dilemma: I always have a “pang” when I mention my blog in a query letter. Not that it’s bad, not that it’s good. I worry about the presumption that the editor wants to take the time to run over and look.
What are your thoughts?
Queries, anyone? « Pinwheels
March 5th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
[...] Dawn at This Woman’s Work has two posts up about queries, which you can read here and here and another one here. [...]