$100 Question Promo Graphic I’m the BlogHer $100 question today! From the good folks at BlogHer:

–The program is called “The $100 Question”
–This is a week-daily program (so, each Monday through Friday) where a different blogger will be asking a question, and one lucky commenter will be entered to win $100 from BlogHer.
–Comments must be made at BlogHer.com to be eligible for the prize.
–Commenters must be registered BlogHer.com users (all you need is an email address to register.)
–Your question’s contest will be open Tuesday, June 8 through Thursday, June 10.

And here’s my question (don’t answer here, answer over there so you can enter to win cold hard cash):

When I was about eleven I had a terrible crush on Almanzo Wilder. I would inhale the last three books of the Little House series on lazy Sundays, rushing through most of the story just to get to the courting. I loved it when Laura tried to let him down easy, telling him outright she was only using him for a ride home from the dreaded Brewsters where she was boarding while she taught school. I loved it more when he showed up the next week anyway. When I tired of Laura’s pioneer romance there was always Gilbert and Anne in the Anne of Green Gables books; Jo’s incomprehensible (to me) rejection of Laurie in Little Women and Calvin O’Keefe’s regard for Meg Murry in the Wrinkle in Time series, which surely gave hope to geeky girls everywhere. Who was your first literary love? Which scenes in which books sent your heart fluttering?

This based on a question I’ve asked on my blog and the answers were so interesting that I wanted to ask it again! So head on over, join up on BlogHer and please share.

THEN go over and read Julia’s amazing post today over at our special needs support site <– search engine bait and have a tissue handy.

Jenna and I are going to be on Dawn Davenport’s Creating a Family radioshow tomorrow along with an agency worker with experience in open adoptions. You can send Dawn (not me, other Dawn) questions you’d like her to ask us by emailing her here: info @creatingafamily.org (remove the space when you copy and paste it).

I’m also going to be interviewed by the CBC tomorrow morning talking about banning racist kids’ books (I’m against banning) although I don’t know when that one airs. I’m headed to our local NPR (WOSU) stations in the morning for the CBC interview and then rushing home to do the other interview on my phone.

Tonight I plan to toss and turn hoping that I will not sneeze, burp or cough on air; that I will be able to speak intelligently without a lot of umm-ing or saying “like” a lot; that I will not overtalk my interviewer; and that I will remember what I had to say. I would like to spend a lot of time worrying myself into a froth today, too, but I have a lot of client work so unfortunately I won’t be able to indulge in being neurotic.

I’ll let you know how it goes tomorrow and also when it’s all supposed to air in case you want to listen in!

I have a lot of jumbled posts in my head but when my work life gets busy, my blog is forced to suffer.

Here is my jumble in shorthand:

Malinda posted about this parenting advice from Brian Stuy:

We have never brought up, unprompted, our daughters’ birth parents. We have discussed adoption, conception and pregnancy, and other corollary issues from time to time, but I have never, without having the subject introduced by a daughter, initiated a conversation by saying, “Do you wish you knew your birth mother?” Or, “Do you want to know more about your abandonment?” I have always indicated a willingness to answer any and all questions (not just about adoption but about anything), so I am confident my kids know that if they ask any question we will try to provide them with a good answer. But the point is, I wait for them to ask. Those that force-feed their children the deep issues of abandonment, birth parents and adoption, risk, I believe, getting the kinds of responses displayed above. In fact, by presenting the reality of birth parents before they are mature enough to handle it, for example, I think we risk diminishing our own position as parents to our children.

• At my grad school interview we were talking about conflict and I said I didn’t like conflict either (in response to someone saying she didn’t like it) but it’s always interesting.

• I am a navel-gazing, feelings junkie, over-thinker. Lots of people aren’t. Learning to respect people’s unfathomable boundaries is ongoing for me. Brett is my primary teacher.

• I was watching Lost on Tuesday, which is chockfull of obvious and less obvious adoption issues and adoption cliches and stereotypes and I was thinking about how deeply ingrained our presumptions are about “real” parents and changelings and lost orphans and false parents. I was thinking about fairy tales and mythology and thinking that our collective unconsciousness already feeds us these ideas. (I am typing this to avoid spoilers.) It doesn’t matter if they are “true” or not — they are part of our belief system.

• So unlike Brian, I think that even if we never ever ever breathe an unasked for word about our kids’ birth parents that our collective unconsciousness is already, in some ways, diminishing our own position as parents to our children. And our kids need to figure that out for themselves, which I think means we should be more explicit in welcoming that discussion. Not because we need to sway them but because we need to hear them out (or at least say to them, “I am bringing this up because I will hear you out”) so that they know whatever direction they choose, whatever belief feels like home to them, we will love them and accept them and never ever leave them. Even if they feel more attached to their birth countries, families and origins than they do to us. They may reject the “blood is thicker than water” belief system or they may not. But they will wonder about it.

• Brian also says:

They might ask at that point if they were born of their adoptive parents, and that would be a good time to answer, “No, you were born to a woman in China.” That is the type of answer I would give. But many use this opportunity to go ahead and answer questions not asked and not even thought of: “No, you were born to a woman in China. She is your birth mother, and she wasn’t able to keep you, so she left you at the gate of the orphanage.” This is the type of over-feeding that overwhelms most kids, and creates, I believe, unnecessarily emotional issues.

• There’s a third response, “No, you were born to a woman in China. What do you think about that?” When Madison learns something new or asks something new, I always end with, “What do you think about that?” or “How do you feel about that?” or “I know that might be confusing. Do you have some questions about that?” I know this kid pretty well and I know when the look on her face means she’s worried or curious or confused. So sometimes when we’re, say, reading a book that has some adoption-ish metaphor, I’ll stop and say, “Does this make you think about your adoption?” or “Is this reminding you of Pennie?”

• I mean, culturally? We romanticize birth ties. I’m not willing to say that this romance is more true or less true. I’m not willing to say that it’s a cultural bias we need to question or reject or welcome with open arms. I think it’s one that’s interesting to explore and for Madison, it is an absolutely vital exploration because it is a conflict she is living. Even if she is not a navel-gazing, feelings junkie who overthinks things, she will need to make sense of it in whatever way she needs to.

• So I bring it up. I don’t say, “Hey, Madison, do you feel so much more tied to Pennie than you do to me? Since she’s your real mother and all?” Instead I say, “How did you feel when so-and-so was talking about how much you look like Pennie?” If I was Brian Stuy in a closed adoption from China, I’d surely say, “Sometimes I wonder about your birth mom. Do you wonder?” Because I would wonder. And if I’m wondering, it’s not such a far stretch to think that the kid herself in question wonders.

• And I ask myself, do I believe the collective unconsciousness about changelings and lost orphans and birth ties? My answer: I do and I don’t. I do not think that birth ties are any more magical and true than love ties. But I do believe that birth ties are rich with meaning. I do think that in a culture that romanticizes our genetic origins that those genetic origins have an important weight.

• For example, gender has tremendous cultural weight, agreed? We can say that gender is a social construct but it does not negate the weight of it. We can say it is a figment of our collective imagination and we can choose NOT to believe that gender matters. Individually, we can do that. But culturally, gender still has weight and our questions and struggle with the cultural construct of gender is practiced against the beliefs that we are questioning. Which is to say, no matter how much we choose to believe that gender does not matter for ourselves, it does matter. Our personal practice of gender exists in contrast to the larger cultural construct. In other words, Lady Gaga owes as big a debt to Phyllis Schlafly as she does to Madonna.

• I find tremendous meaning in my own birth ties. (Witness my conversion to Judaism, the religion of my paternal ancestors.) I am, admittedly, biased to believe that Madison will find meaning in hers.

Oh this is a convoluted entry but it was a treat to babble on. My to-do list has grown like a batch of tribbles while I was writing though so no time to clean it up. Ack.

I just had my second grad school interview and I have no idea how it went. But I’ll give a rundown.

I really liked both the professors I’ve met so far most especially the one I met twice. The attitude seems to be, “Are we a good fit for you?” Rather than, “Are you good enough for us?” I also really appreciated the diversity among students — age, race and experience. Still mostly women but you know, I can live with that.

This was a much shorter interview (two hours versus six or seven) and everyone who applies to the school gets interviewed so it wasn’t hand-picked like the other school. Although from what folks said in their intros, there are impressive resumes in the room.

They asked only two questions and I’ll go ahead and tell them to you since they are versions of questions asked at the other interview, too, and maybe you’re thinking about a clinical counseling masters.

  1. Why get your MEd in clinical counseling rather than a psychology PhD or a MSW? (All the degrees get you to essentially the same professional space if you want to be a counselor so it’s a good question.)
  2. Tell us about a time when you were criticized and how you handled it.

The first school asked question number two pretty much as written above. This school asked it in a way that I thought was more interesting. “Tell about a time when someone gave you an interpretation of you that didn’t mesh with your own image of yourself” (or something like that). I told them about my fall from Blithe and Happy Adopter to Adopter Who Acknowledges Her Collusion with an Unjust System. I hope I made sense.

I have no idea how I did or what impression I made other than I felt not very well spoken. Sometimes my brain goes faster than my mouth (you know how that is — worse when you’re nervous or keyed up) and I can only hope that I didn’t sound as much like I was babbling as I felt like I was. Plus that whole fall from adoption grace is complicated and time was limited but I wanted to give an example of not just learning from my mistakes but of changing because of my mistakes. I felt like the way they asked the question demanded this kind of introspection while for the first school when they asked about how I handled criticism I told them, “I’m a writer. Handling criticism is part of my job description.” Then I cracked a joke about how first I fling myself down on the sofa and weep into a pillow and then I get up and rewrite. I finished with, “The piece is always better thanks to my editor so I’ve learned to appreciate criticism.” They didn’t laugh at my sofa joke. That’s when I should’ve known they weren’t going to accept me.

(Square your shoulders and soldier on, Dawn!)

Anyway, they say that we will hear in two to three weeks via mail so I’m happy that I won’t be reduced to hitting refresh on a web page. We shall see. And if I don’t get in, I am seriously going to ask you guys to send me sympathy cards and chocolate because I will be very very very very very let down.

Oh and if I don’t get in? I’m going to assume it’s because the writing sample (both schools have you give a writing sample, which I hear is to prove you didn’t find some stranger on the interwebz to write your personal statement for cold hard paypal) I gave them is illegible. The first school had us at computers but this one had us write by hand. By hand, people! I can barely read my grocery list these days! I never write by hand anymore! In fact, my rabbi asked me (in all earnestness and concern) if I had dysgraphia when he got a look at my muddled handwriting! I wrote extra slow to try to combat my basic inability to write legibly and then Brett reassured me that if one word is hard to read, he can usually figure out what I meant by look at the words before and after. Because, yeah, professors love nothing better than deciphering the scrawl of a wannabe student with a mad case of carpal tunnel syndrome due to her addiction to her keyboard.

(sigh)

We shall see!

I accidentally woke up at 4ish this morning and couldn’t get back to sleep so I gave in and got up. It does not bode well for the day (she types ominously). I don’t know if there’s enough coffee in the world to save me.

Yesterday Madison was asking questions about her bio dad and we dove into topics I’ve been dreading. Luckily my dread was propelling me to think hard about how to address them so I wasn’t totally unprepared. As a matter of fact, just last week I talked to Brett about it and his advice was avoid avoid avoid but he also said that his advice is always avoidance so probably I shouldn’t take that to heart. So I asked him what he thought my advice would be if I was advising someone else. I said, “Pretend you’re me. What do you think I would tell someone?” Because I felt too close to it all to really make a good decision. And he sighed and said, “Well, you would probably say to be honest and upfront and you would probably be right.” (Brett trusts my advice to other people but he’s not always happy about following it himself because it is rarely the easy way out.)

I’m not going to share any details of the conversation or even her reaction except that clearly reality was knocking up against her fantasies and I could see how … jarring it was for her. (Which, as an aside, makes me sure talking about this now was so important because her fantasies were not serving her well.)

I never tell Madison how she ought to feel about anything in her adoption but this time I did emphasize that she gets to decide how meaningful this information would be for her. I think this is a heavy idea for a 5-year old (really, for anyone) but I wanted to start what will be an ongoing discussion. I mean, I’ve had that talk with Noah but nothing on this level because nothing that’s happened to him is on the level of being adopted. So when I say to Noah, “You can choose not to be flipped out about your Hebrew test tomorrow. You can choose to feel a different way about it.” It’s big and it’s empowering but it’s on a fairly reasonable scale for a seventh grader. For Madison, saying, “You can choose what this person means to you and what this information about him means to you” is just HUGE and I’m sure she will be grappling with this off and on for her whole life, really. Although she’s smarter than I am so maybe she’ll nail it younger.

Also I really had to stomp on my knee jerk reaction to say, “But you have Daddy! So who needs this guy?” I was surprised at how much I wanted to do that, how much I wanted to assert that Brett fixes all and thank god for the internet and the adoptee blogs because I bit my tongue (hard and repeatedly) to not say that and just really listen to her feelings about her bio dad.

It’s hard to find the balance between not dismissing her reaction entirely (like acting as if she can simply toss her head and forget about it) but also giving her control over her reaction. With the kinds of things Noah worries about, it’s easy to tear it down to manageable pieces so that he can quickly get his head around it (more or less). But the lesson for Madison is something that I am still learning — namely that we have some choice in how events impact us. I just hope that her head start means she won’t be thirty-something and sitting in her counselor’s office saying, “Wait — I can choose not to be victimized by these circumstances that are out of my control?” (I was 33 and talking about resolving my infertility and flipping that switch is what let me stop being infertile even though I still couldn’t have a baby.)

The one thing I’ll tell you because it’s kind of funny is that Madison was surprised that her bio dad doesn’t have a ponytail. I don’t know why she thought he might have a ponytail because I can’t think of any man she knows who has one or anyone on television or a movie she’s seen. I mean, sure, she’s seen guys with ponytails but not in her day-to-day life so who could predict that would be part of her imaginary picture of him?

(Noah was surprised to see that her bio dad isn’t black even though he’s known this but I guess he wasn’t listening. That was funny to me, too, but not as funny as the ponytail.)

© 2010 this woman's work Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha