My mom always says the problem with liberals (and she counts herself proudly among them) is that we are always saying, “Ok, I see your point. I get where you’re coming from even though I don’t agree.” The ACLU is the epitome of this, right? Defending the KKK and neo-nazi groups?

Anyway.

We had a trollish person (but I don’t think an actual internet-defined troll) appear on Open Adoption Support recently and I blocked her. I NEVER block people. I’ve never blocked anyone here or there because I am a great believer of discourse. I know some bloggers who only push through their positive comments or handpick the negative ones to post only those they can answer to or are sure to invite reader defense and I am not one of those people. (Caveat: If people are just screaming obscenities or threats and you block ‘em? That’s not cherrypicking — that’s being sensible but fortunately I’ve never had those nutjobs so I haven’t had to block them either.) As long as someone is making a point or representing a perspective that is part of the discussion (however uncomfortable), I believe those commenters have value even when reading the comments makes me cringe or wince or get defensive or feel bad about myself.

But you know, Open Adoption Support is a labor of love. It’s cost me money over the years and keeping up on the tech is a headache. (It’s been inundated by spam that needs to be blocked bit by bit because an earlier incarnation was vulnerable and updates haven’t been able to close the doors that were opened then.) I had bigger picture plans for it but life interceded and now I see it mostly as a place to post the community wisdom questions and I think it has real value in that small work.

I set OAS up in August 2006 and I was never able to turn it into what I wanted to turn it into. (I think now — seeing how much work Support for Special Needs is — that I just didn’t have the time it needed to grow it like I hoped). But that’s ok because I like what it turned out to be. I like the community wisdom questions and appreciate the varying points of view there. I also have even LESS time to work on it so I’m pretty ok with going in as needed with time set aside to deal with the ever-encroaching spam. (Last month when I totally cleared the database in preparation for moving it over to a cheaper hosting solution, I deleted about THREE THOUSAND spam users. It was incredibly tedious because I had to do it by hand.)

This is all to say that when someone came over there and started posting an anti-openness point of view (she says she’s not anti-openness but you wouldn’t know it from reading her comments there), I got fed up. And I resented it. I’m not some huge conglomerate like Adoption.com getting rich by pandering to agencies. I’m not obligated to appeal to as many people as possible. Any community member can go to just about any other adoption discussion group and get support for anti-openness rhetoric. The poster herself proved this by going back to one of the forums complaining about the response she got to a post on OAS. To my mind her original question was clearly someone seeking permission from pro-openness people to shut down aspects of her child(ren)’s adoption. We get some of those. Heck, I get some of those here. People say, “Sure, you’re all OPEN THIS OPEN THAT but what about THIS situation????” But they don’t want problem-solving; they want pro-openness people to acquiesce to their pro-closed decision, which is not reasonable. It’s like going to an Orthodox Jewish site and trying to get them to see the wisdom of the Gospel. It just ain’t gonna happen.

I have met many adoptive parents who have closed their open adoptions but in a spirit of openness. Seriously, you can do this. It’s not as contrary as you might think. These are parents who realize that for the safety of their child’s well-being, the adoption needs to be less open or even closed entirely but they seek to allow their child connection within the necessary constraints of safety. They continue open dialogue. They honor their children’s mixed feelings. They own their own frustrations, anger or resentment. They revisit their decisions as their children grow or as the first families make other decisions. In short, they are pro-open parents living the reality of our imperfect world. So I know — I KNOW — that openness is first and foremost an attitude.

Likewise I know adoptive parents who are in theoretically open adoptions who are not open at all. They may send photos and letters and they may even have visits but they segregate their children’s adoptions. They shut down discussions. They make their children’s first parents jump through hoops or tightly control contact for no reason except that having an open adoption makes them uncomfortable.

Open Adoption Support is there to support those families with an attitude of openness whatever their circumstances and to ask families with an anti-open attitude to reconsider their decisions. The bias — it’s right there in the title — is OPENNESS.

You know, like I said, I’m working to more compassion but I cannot be compassionate when someone is defending her right to offend other people in the community by playing ignorant. I mean, you really care about your adopted kid? Read some freaking research. Do it before you adopt for God’s sakes. I’m not saying go on Adoption.com and say, “Hey, openness. What’s up with that?” I’m saying GO READ THE RESEARCH. I’ve read the research and you know what it says? It says it’s in your child’s best interest for you to figure out how to have a healthy, happy open adoption:

When children were involved in adoptive kinship networks involving contact with birth family members, child adjustment was related not only to qualities of relationships within the adoptive family but also to collaboration in relationships between the adoptive parents and birth family members involved in contact. Collaboration in relationships is an emergent property of the adoptive kinship network, characterized by the ability of the child’s adoptive and birthparents to work together effectively on behalf of the child’s well-being. It involves collaborative control over the way in which contact is handled and is based on mutual respect, empathy, and valuing of the relationship. Higher degrees of collaboration in the adoptive kinship network were associated with better adjustment during middle childhood (Grotevant, Ross, Marchel, & McRoy, 1999). [emphasis mine]

Read the whole summary right here if you want more.

Now none of us can control how the other people involved in the adoption behave; we can only control our behavior. And this is when that attitude of openness comes in. When adoptive parents are able to own their frustrations and not visit them on their kids, that’s a real and true commitment to their child. When they are able to sit down and talk to their kid in age appropriate ways about the challenges in the open adoption (drug addiction, struggles with mental illness, past abuse) or even why they need to limit or close the adoption, to my mind that’s “respect, empathy and valuing of the relationship.”

I know that’s not easy — that’s why I built the dang site.

Ugh. I’ll just post part of the snippet here (because I’m barking mad about it). You CANNOT come to OAS and type something like:

you can be the birth, biological, first etc but mother, mom, mommy is a title earned by the sleepless nights, the worry, the support financially and emotionally .

And then say, hey, so what. It’s an OPINION. It’s so outside the culture of that site that it has no place. I mean, I wouldn’t go to a freaking unschooling site and tell everyone they need to assign homework and then say, “What?!? It’s an OPINION!” Know your audience, people! And if you’re talking about your experience? OWN IT!!!! Don’t put it on every other first parent at the site and then act confused when someone (like the moderator) confronts you.

Except that I think she’s trolling. And that pisses me off. I have no time for trolls! I feel like that’s an abuse of my time and attention!

Wow. I am really mad about this. I’m sort of amused by how annoyed I am about it. I think I’m more annoyed by her posting it there then if she’d posted it here because there I don’t have the same recourse as here because I always tried to keep all nicey-nice and neutral there and I don’t here. But now I’ve dragged it over here to bitch about it and I feel much, much better. In fact, I think I’m done being annoyed because I went ahead and blocked her and then posted about it here.

Venting. The secret to low blood pressure! Ta-da!

It’s an annual tradition. My mom celebrates her birthday by taking my sister’s family and mine to the fair and spoiling the kids rotten. My kids look forward to it like they look forward to Christmas or Halloween. The very first words Madison said to me that morning were, “I’m going to have Italian ice and an elephant ear both!” The kid was still trying to focus her eyes but she was already planning ahead!

The fair we go to is the local county fair and it’s teensy-tiny, which makes it absolutely manageable on a weekday night. It’s always brutally hot and humid and sometimes it rains (not this year thank goodness) and there are just a handful of rides. It’s smallness makes it perfect because the boys can take off on their own without worrying anyone and it’s pretty impossible to lose anyone. You can also do every single thing two or three times if you want and still have time to check out the animals.

This year Madison was too big for some of the little kid rides and too small for most of the big kid rides. That was hard on Noah when it happened (later than it happened to Madison — she’s very tall for her age) but Madison took it in stride. And that picture there is her with Brett riding The Drop. First words when she came down the stairs after? “I am never doing THAT again!” But said laughing and excited and she is already planning to do it again next year.

The fair bookended a week of crazy fun for Madison. She had the PDX cousins in town and that meant visits to the ice cream shop and late nights through the week. Then Pennie took her out on a date (we watched Roscoe and Tommy had to work so it was just the two of them). Then Pennie and Tommy and Roscoe took her swimming and out to dinner and for more ice cream.

Let’s just say Madison’s bedtime routine has been a wee bit ganked and now with this awful heat, none of us is sleeping all that well so it’s been a bit crazy around here.

After her swim date with Pennie and family, Madison came home and cried and cried. She was sorry that it was over. She said, “I don’t want to be home with you! I want to be having fun with Pennie!” I said, “It’d be great if fun things never ever had to end.” And she said, “I don’t want them to end!” Then she conceded that I was fun “sometimes” because I let her walk on the low wall by the ice cream shop but that I am not as fun as Pennie because I was making her brush her teeth. I said, “Listen, honey, when Pennie chose me to be your Mommy Mama, she assigned me the job of being the mama who makes you brush your teeth. That’s my job but we can sit here while you’re sad for awhile more.” Eventually Madison brushed her teeth but she did not like it! And she only sorta liked me.

Honestly sitting there, I felt kinda like the divorced mom with the non-custodial dad who wines and dines the kids and then drops ‘em off, you know? I felt a little bit like that. I felt a little bit sad that I couldn’t be the Fun Mama. It’d been a long day and I was hot and tired and I’ll admit that I drooped and had to close my eyes and take a deep breath about it.

I want my kids to have great times with lots of folks and I don’t always have to (or want to) go along. And of course, I especially value Madison’s relationship with Pennie and I am grateful when they get to be with each other. I also LOVE that Madison is old enough to grab her carseat out of the van, stick it in Pennie’s car, climb in and wave good-bye. I love that she is old enough to take ownership in that way. Still. I had a moment there on the couch. A droopiing moment.

I was thinking, too, about them all heading out to go swimming. Roscoe looks just like Tommy and Madison looks just like Pennie and they are a beautiful little family together. I was thinking about that and about the glorious intimacy of swimming. Yanking on that sticky swimsuit, washing Madison’s hair free of chlorine afterward in the shower. The two of them having that time together makes me very very happy. (I know that being Pennie’s best beloved fills Madison’s heart up in indescribable ways and I believe it fills up Pennie’s heart, too.)

But, as I was telling LiaNotJuno (not linked here because I’m not sure that she needs/wants the traffic), I can see how this can be a challenge for people.

LiaNotJuno asked me how I got to this place in open adoption and I told her that in general (because in particular it has so much to do with Pennie) I can see three things that played into my orientation towards open adoption:

  • I’m a feminist so I believe in Pennie’s right to create her own version of motherhood. (Note: My feelings about her freedom to do this have changed since learning more about the way the adoption industry works but I still absolutely believe every woman has the right to create her own version of motherhood.)
  • I’m a crunchy granola earthmama who believes in a child’s intrinsic tie to the woman who grew him and gave birth to him.
  • I’m a child of divorce and I understand that the boundaries of family are permeable.

Although I felt like the put upon divorced mom for a minute there sitting on the couch, I also know that in a zillion ways our open adoption is nothing like that. But I get that feeling and I was thinking on how that feeling might sit with someone who has a more troubled open adoption or has less faith in (or is more threatened by) the idea that their child has a profound tie to this other parent or who is a child of a much more contentious divorce and experiences that feeling as CONFLICT.

I have been trying to put myself in the place of parents who struggle more with their children’s relationships with their first parents because I feel like I really need to learn some more compassion and understanding around this. Earlier this summer I was put in the position where some parents with whom I philosophically don’t agree  have been reaching out to me for support and even though some of what they said made my spine freeze up, I realized that if I want to be a counselor, I really need to tone down my activist reactions and start listening. Obviously online discourse is very different than one-on-one in-person discourse and I learned a lot by listening and then trying to dig through my own experiences so that I could identify with what they were seeing even if I still had strong feelings about what they needed to do. And what I found is that if I’m listening, it’s not that hard to understand where someone is coming from and I become a lot more useful to them AND a better advocate.

So as I sat there on the couch watching Madison drag herself to the bathroom to brush her teeth (tears, oh the wailing and the tears!) I thought, “Remember this right here and imagine what it would be like not to be interested in shrugging it off or not being able to shrug it off. Imagine making decisions from THIS PLACE of exhaustion and insecurity.” Because I want to be able to be a counselor who can say, “I get that. I hear you” but who still is working to get people to work through that and get back to where they need to be for their kids.

I hugely value the online activism that I have been fortunate enough to witness and sometimes participate in but now I want to do less of that to focus more on in real life service and learning, which is why I’m excited about school. I think that will make me a better activist long-term, too. So I’m gonna shut up and listen more.

Mostly. Because I’m still gonna talk.

Are there any things that you don’t want the other members of your triad to know—or that you don’t want to know about them? I’ve heard first mothers talk about not sharing their birth stories with adoptive parents because those are for the adoptees and for themselves only. Ive also heard of adoptees concealing their reunions from adoptive parents so as not to cause them pain. What don’t you want shared in your adoptive relationships?

via Open Adoption Roundtable #17 : Production, Not Reproduction | A blog about open adoption.

I was just talking about this to Julia today.

As most of you know, I’ve come by my adoption politics first very generally, picking around what I was learning about adoption and thinking about it from the context of my feminism. Then, after we adopted Madison, it all became more deeply personal for me because my relationship with Pennie grew and strengthened and I was forced to reconsider some of what I believed. For me, the result has been that I look back through a critical lens that I simply didn’t have access to at the start of our journey.

I am not antiadoption. I do not regret being Madison’s mother by adoption. I do not believe that I have the right to decide whether or not Pennie’s decision was ultimately the “right” one or the “wrong” one. I’m not saying any of that. I am saying this: I would not want my daughter to have the experience that her first mother had and if I had known then what I know now, my participation would have looked very different.

This isn’t a surprise to any of you, not if you’ve been reading. And it may not mean what you think it means because for me to detail what I would have done differently would mean I would have to share things I can’t share (that I have no right to share). It also doesn’t mean that I extrapolate my experience to anyone else’s experience. My feeling are specific, wrapped up in my participation in THIS story and in THESE people’s lives.

Here we get to the prompt.

When I first started reexamining Madison’s adoption, it was very scary. It was a lot of long conversations with Brett and sleepless nights. It meant confronting things I wanted to leave alone and it meant (means) a struggle not to let myself fall selfishly into guilt. I was also worried about talking to Pennie about it. I was afraid to tell her any of it because I was afraid she’d be angry. At the same time I felt like there were things I needed to say to relieve some of HER burden. (Again, can’t get into too many details here and I apologize for that because I don’t know how much sense this will make.)

See, as I was thinking critically about the adoption industry and more critically about my experience in it, of course I was thinking about Pennie’s experience. Now I’m not going to define her experience but it’s pretty easy to point to X and say, “That was not OK” but then I wondered, should I tell Pennie that I thought it wasn’t OK? Should I not?

There were a lot of reasons not to like:

  • She didn’t ask me. If she didn’t ask, did I have to answer?
  • She has different opinions than I do about lots of stuff including adoption. Couldn’t I just hide behind her more positive opinions?
  • She might get mad about adoption and then get mad at ME.

That third one, that was the one that really got in my way because I could answer the other two. The first one? Yeah, maybe. I mean, it’s one thing to foist an unwelcome point of view on someone and it’s another thing to be a part of conversation and not hold back because of #2 or #3. And second? Pennie and I have discussions about a lot of things, including politics and moral values. Sometimes we agree and sometimes we don’t but I’m always honest with her. Also there’s a difference between being bombastic and having a dialogue.

So were three (maybe lame) reasons I should not to talk to Pennie about it and one really good reason I should: Pennie was beating herself up.

I remember when I was a slutty little teenager but I wanted to believe that I was an empowered young woman. I thought sex was power (thank you, Madonna!) and that to be sexy and to do sex was to be powerful and exercise my power. Actually I was a hungry sad small thing desperate for love and acceptance and willing to trade on my body to get it. For awhile I held onto the idea that I was empowered but that didn’t allow me to grow and move past this image of myself as a slutty little teenager. It also meant that I continued to be slutty even though this made me sad. (I met Brett when I was twenty and I’d been in therapy for awhile then — I remember my therapist brought me a cupcake for my 20th birthday so I was re-examining my slutty teenage ways while I was still barely a teen.) I had to think critically before I could change my image of myself and that was painful but freeing. Does that make sense? I didn’t want to admit that I’d been HAD by the patriarchy but I also wanted to stop sleeping around, which meant I had to be honest with myself about it. If it was so FUN to be slutty, why was I so sad? But if I admitted that it wasn’t working for me, then suddenly all those boyfriends kinda lost their glamorous sheen. (Eventually with therapy I was able to see that nothing is all this or all that and that I could own my history and my experiences without shame but also allow myself to grow past them and into something better.)

I have no desire to define Pennie’s adoption experience, ok? I said that and I mean that. But I do desire that Pennie know that she is one rocking woman and a fabulous mother and a survivor (not a victim) of her circumstances (just like my own formerly slutty little self). I also want her to know that regardless of how she feels about her surrender of Madison and my adoption of Madison that there are still things that were wrong. Even if she feels that placing Madison with us was an awesome decision worthy of zillions of high fives, there are parts of the process that were not good to her. That’s just true.

We didn’t talk about it for a long time but every time we had an adoption discussion, I’d get squirmy. I’d want to change the subject to something more general (adoption generalities, please! Cut the specifics, thanks!) but I felt like I was lying because I was not interrupting Pennie’s willing assumption that any pain she got was just what she deserved.

So eventually we talked about it. I don’t remember what I said (it’s an ongoing discussion anyway) but I do remember the first time I said something that I felt light-headed and that I was probably talking too fast. I usually clean my kitchen or do laundry or other fidgety things when I’m on the phone so I remember pacing in the kitchen with a wet sponge on my hand and at one point looking outside the kitchen window at the roof of our garage with the tree branches waving over it and crying. And I do remember the end of our conversation, which was loving and warm and full of “I love you, too.”

Wait, I’m thinking back and I do remember one thing I said. I do remember I said, “But would you want Madison treated like that? Because I don’t. And I wish you hadn’t been either.” Because whatever self-hatred we mothers struggle with lord knows that we want better for our daughters.

I didn’t want to share that. I didn’t want to share my complicity with Pennie. I wanted to leave well enough alone and let her work through it however she needed to and hold very still and hope that somehow I would avoid her critical gaze but that would have been fundamentally dishonest. Pennie was all too willing to shoulder any blame she might uncover and that isn’t fair.

One day I told her that eventually she might be angry with me and that I’d understand if she was and I’d love her anyway and never ever ever punish her by withholding Madison and she laughed and said, “Oh I love you, Dawn.” She is a better woman than I am, I’ll tell you that now.

She’s in Mexico right now visiting Tommy’s family with Roscoe and I miss her.

I’m over at the Huffington Post today:

Over lunch the other day, I asked my 5-year old daughter what I should write in this essay.

“I’m going to write about your adoption,” I told her. “What do you want people to know?”

“I want them to know that adoption is hard,” she answered right away. “I want them to know it’s hard being away from your real, real mommy.”

via Rebecca Walker: This Is My Daughter’s Mother: Dawn Friedman’s Happy Family.

Jenna and I are going to be on Dawn Davenport’s Creating a Family radioshow tomorrow along with an agency worker with experience in open adoptions. You can send Dawn (not me, other Dawn) questions you’d like her to ask us by emailing her here: info @creatingafamily.org (remove the space when you copy and paste it).

I’m also going to be interviewed by the CBC tomorrow morning talking about banning racist kids’ books (I’m against banning) although I don’t know when that one airs. I’m headed to our local NPR (WOSU) stations in the morning for the CBC interview and then rushing home to do the other interview on my phone.

Tonight I plan to toss and turn hoping that I will not sneeze, burp or cough on air; that I will be able to speak intelligently without a lot of umm-ing or saying “like” a lot; that I will not overtalk my interviewer; and that I will remember what I had to say. I would like to spend a lot of time worrying myself into a froth today, too, but I have a lot of client work so unfortunately I won’t be able to indulge in being neurotic.

I’ll let you know how it goes tomorrow and also when it’s all supposed to air in case you want to listen in!

© 2010 this woman's work Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha