I was emailing back and forth with a friend this morning who was asking some questions related to the powerpoint sample and my own adoption experiences. It’s stuff I don’t write specifically about here because it concerns extended family and likely they wouldn’t want me to or other people in the family wouldn’t want me to. I wonder how it’ll go if/when I write a book about it because then I’ll want to include it.
But there’s a slide in the powerpoint show that talks about friends/family support and so I wanted to say that no, my family hasn’t always been as supportive of our open adoption as I would like. The ones who were least supportive have come around but their concerns were typical: That we were preventing Pennie from moving on; that Madison would be confused; that we were making too much of her adoption. And there was a (blessedly short) time when there were feelings of competitiveness on this side of the family. (Something else — a long time ago Laurel talked about how she felt that adoptive families and first families often mirror each other in their challenges and the survey results bear this out although generally the feelings — as measured in the survey — are stronger in first families. So if adoptive parents feel insecure, likely first parents do, too, only more so. Which is to say that I’m not privvy to Pennie’s family’s feelings but I can guess.)
Even now when we do have support and encouragement, we have other family members who are determinedly neutral, which to me feels negative. This is a studied neutrality, a “let’s not bring it up and it’ll all be fine” that’s really a polite rejection. I don’t see how you can be neutral about our relationship with Madison’s first family without some measure of dismissal not just of Madison’s first family but of Madison herself because they are of her and she is of them.
So what do I mean by neutral? I mean never asking after Pennie (if you’re the kind of person who might ask after other extended family, why wouldn’t you ask after Pennie?). I mean making a “hmmm” sound and changing the subject when I bring her up. I mean steadfastly ignoring the obvious, which is that Madison is adopted.
When we had family members struggling with this the argument was that Madison didn’t need to have her adoption emphasized and so we ought to pretend she was “just like” a bio child. Pictures of Pennie, regular visits and discussion — these undermined the “just like” play-acting and the people who espoused the play felt that it would be damaging to Madison. My argument is (and was) that ignoring it would create way more tension and worry. The other thing is that we all needed time to get used to things and why not get this awkward fumbling out of the way while Madison was small?
This is how it’s worked out, too. The relatives we see the most all pretty much take it for granted now and no one blanches when they see Pennie’s picture displayed with the rest of the family pictures. I just wish more people would feel comfortable asking to see them or deliberately walking across the room to look. That would feel welcoming to me. (I understand that some folks are guided by the misapprehension that it wouldn’t be polite to express particular interest but I’ll tell you right now that it would be absolutely polite. It would be no different than saying, “Oh is this so-and-so holding baby Noah? How adorable!”)
I think that the machinations of “just like” play-acting are more outrageous in a transracial adoption anyway. There’s no passing here. Perhaps this is why neutrality seems even more like rejection to me or why neutrality seems so much more obvious.
I’m not bashing people who err on the side of caution, by the way. And I’m talking about family, not friends because family has the benefit of our point of view to lead them and so their choice to act as if adoption didn’t exist feels much more blatant.
But there’s a possibility that things will be different this visit since some of the family members I’m talking about here are people I’ll be seeing in Oregon. (And to any family members who are reading this and wondering if I mean them — I know who reads my blog out there the great Pacific Northwest and so if you’re reading this? It’s not you.)
I have two kids and a delightfully odd husband, Brett. My children are Noah (born to us in 1997) and Madison (born to her first mom, Pennie, in 2004 and brought to our family through a domestic, open adoption). They are my inspiration and also the reason I don't get more done around here.
I'm a writer and sometimes I get published, which is a nice thing. I write for joy, I write for money and when I'm very lucky, both things happen at the same time. My work appears in national publications including Yoga Journal, Disney's Family.com, Utne, Wondertime, Brain Child and Salon. Currently I am working on a book about my daughter's adoption and seeking representation for the proposal. I also own Smart Cookie Communications with my husband.
Becca
March 21st, 2008 at 8:30 am
You know, I’m with you on everything except the asking about Pennie. In some ways this seems akin to an in-law situation to me, which is something I’m dealing with right now. Pennie is YOUR relative, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that she is the relative of your relatives. My husband’s family is my family, but they are not my mother and sister’s family. And while my mother and sister are obligated to accept, actively, my relationship with them, they are not obligated to engage in that relationship on their own. Make sense? So in your shoes I would expect my relatives to honor my relationship with Pennie, and to engage with my family if we were talking about Pennie and to engage with Pennie if she were in their presence, but if they called and said “So how’s Madison, and how’s Noah, and how’s Brett?” I would not expect them to add “and how’s Pennie?”
Dawn
March 21st, 2008 at 8:38 am
Ok, I’m not talking about specific people here (but pretending to be vague) and they do ask about other family members to whom they are not actually related. But more to the point, they actively change the subject if we bring it up. So, for example, “Yeah, my sister’s cards are selling really well!”
“Oh that’s so great! Does she have plans to send them to more shops?”
Then, “Yeah, Pennie got second place in this big cooking contest!”
“Hmmm, that reminds me — is anyone hungry?”
Lisa V
March 21st, 2008 at 9:57 pm
Yeah, we had family members for the longest time who would squirm uncomfortably when we talked about Mallory’s birth family or Mason’s birth father. What I can equate it to was when I would talk about my friends who were gay and had AIDs. The same squirming. My relationships that they tolerated but didn’t want to know about.
I think with the birth families they hoped it was just a phase and we’d all move on.
It’s better now. No one even blanched when I mentioned that Mallory was going to go nanny for her birth mother this summer. I think they now feel more secure with their place in Mallory’s life, and my place as her mother. She’s almost a grown-up and is perfectly capable of loving both of us, something I knew all along, but I think they had to see over the long term.
Michelle
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:12 am
Dawn, I think people squirm or avoid the situation, because most people really can’t understand giving away a child - adoption or not. Further, who gives away a child then watches that child being raised in another family? As much as people would like to normalize adoption, I really don’t think it’s possible. People can adjust to a situation, but not fully understand it.
I know a couple in an open adoption and see the interaction among the a-family and the the kids’ families. They are trying to make the best of a bizarre situation. One boy sleeps with a picture he has of his mother and siblings. He doesn’t understand after visits with his mother, father and sibs, why he can’t go home with them. How do you explain this to a child? One day his parents couldn’t keep him; not long after they are capable of keeping him -but he can’t be with them. Eventually he will get used to it, just because that’s the way it is.
I imagine he asks himself “why?” all the time. If he is asking himself why, then certainly, the people around him are doing the same.