Dawn, you hate adoptive parents, don’t you?
Contrary to popular belief, I gave up self-hatred around the same time I quit listening to The Smiths on obsessive repeat and started wearing colors. I don’t hate adoptive parents, obviously, being that I am one and being that there are several besides myself that I quite like (I’ll start with my husband).
But you think all adoptive parents should feel guilty.
I do not want all adoptive parents to feel guilty just like I don’t think all white, straight, middle-class people ought to feel guilty. But I do think it behooves us to know that most of us don’t come by our successes — even the hard-won successes — without the halo of our unearned privilege. How we choose to acknowledge that privilege and work to end it is up to us but seems like feeling guilty — because I have been known to indulge — ends up being awfully selfish. (It lures us into thinking we’re making change merely by the act of suffering.)
Well, you’re always on the side of first parents!
I’m not the one forcing people to take sides. I come by my beliefs honest — at the knee of my ever-lovin’ feminist mother. And please note that Pennie doesn’t always agree with me. If I were going to change my point of view to try to curry favor with first mothers, she’d be at the top of my list. But — alas — I can’t help but believe what I believe even when it makes me more or less popular.
So do you want kids to rot away in foster care and orphanages without ever having a real home?
Frankly when I write about adoption I’m writing about the particulars of domestic infant adoption. The issues sometimes overlap but are certainly not the same as those found in international adoption and foster-to-adopt. There is a different urgency in foster-to-adopt and in international adoption because in those situations there is a child who needs a home. That’s not to say that this very pressing need negates ethical issues just that the issues are different and, I think, more complicated.
In any case, in domestic infant adoption there is much more obvious coercion and because the relationships are more direct, there’s more possibility for hopeful adoptive parents to hurt/help the situation.
If you hate adoption so much, why don’t you just give Madison back?
Oh this question! One I’ve heard from pro-adoption and anti-adoption folks alike! Amazing but yes, some of them have something in common (rigidity). Giving Madison back (besides creating a whole host of issues and being based on a whole host of wrong assumptions) would do nothing to solve the issues inherent to domestic infant adoption.
Listen, adoption as a reproductive choice needs to exist. But it’s just not a free and clear choice for most women. As I’ve said zillions of times before, even if a woman is perfectly happy with her decision to place or truly feels it was her best option and even if she feels her agency/attorney did absolutely right by her, there is still a larger system at play that is problematic. Those bigger things at play are what concern me.
Do you think every adoption is bad?
No. I don’t even think every domestic infant adoption is bad. This is complicated but I’m going to give it a whirl. There is a big ugly over-arching system that’s rooted in -isms. Those -isms (racism, classism, heterosexism) create unfair advantages for some of us and unfair disadvantages for others. In adoption some of those -isms are so deeply ingrained that people pretty blithely celebrate some of the things that are most ugly. Domestic infant adoption — as a whole — treats children like commodities and the women who carry them like they’re disposable. But I don’t think every adoption is bad because within this system we are individuals.
I have said a million times that in a perfect world I don’t think adoption would exist (because we could all have our children at exactly the right time in exactly the right circumstances and our families could look any way we liked) but in an imperfect world we need to try harder to be ethical with each other.
Well, why do you have birth mothers on pedestals then?
I don’t. First parents are people — some of them suck and some of them are awesome (you know, just like adoptive parents and other generalized groups of people). I can only tell you that our cultural biases are so enormous that we (collective we) have a tendency to forget the humanity of the people that we (collective we) are keeping down. As a person with a vagina, I have a particular interest in the systemic ways we punish women for being women.
So who is Madison’s real mother?
Madison has two mothers and they are both real. By honoring the truth of Pennie’s motherhood I am not denigrating my own. Having Pennie in her life does not make me any less Madison’s mother. Likewise my active parenting of Madison does not make Pennie any less her mother. This is not a contest. I can see your child’s first mom in your family without missing the truth of you. I can see your joy without ignoring her sorrow. I can acknowledge your gifts without denying hers.
I have two kids and a delightfully odd husband, Brett. My children are Noah (born to us in 1997) and Madison (born to her first mom, Pennie, in 2004 and brought to our family through a domestic, open adoption). They are my inspiration and also the reason I don't get more done around here.
I'm a writer and sometimes I get published, which is a nice thing. I write for joy, I write for money and when I'm very lucky, both things happen at the same time. My work appears in national publications including Yoga Journal, Disney's Family.com, Utne, Wondertime, Brain Child and Salon. Currently I am working on a book about my daughter's adoption and seeking representation for the proposal. I also own Smart Cookie Communications with my husband.
Jenna
February 23rd, 2008 at 6:20 pm
This is too deep for Saturday. Re-post on Monday when I’m feeling witchy.
Lilian
February 23rd, 2008 at 8:15 pm
[Standing up and applauding] I want to be you when I grow up
Mayhem
February 24th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Thanks for your willingness to patiently (mostly!
) say the same things over and over again about privilege and taking sides and “real” mothers. You’re awesome!
Abby
February 24th, 2008 at 6:38 am
“I can see your child’s first mom in your family without missing the truth of you. I can see your joy without ignoring her sorrow. I can acknowledge your gifts without denying hers.”
You’re just so good at this.
abebech
February 24th, 2008 at 8:57 am
Dawn, I’m with you here, though my particular concerns are for international adoption. I have to be honest, though — while I know we (aparents) have more to “give” as you say, I’m really struggling with maintaining compassion in response to a direct insult/assault right now. Fortunately ethical behavior isn’t based on “feelings.”
suz
February 24th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Thank you for this and for all you do. I know you take alot of heat from your “side” for being able to see all sides. I liken it to the heat I take for fraternizing with the enemies (adoptive parents).
Thank you for your compassion and for your ability to see that moms like me and the children we bear are people, humans, and not incubators or objects to be bought and sold to the highest bidder - as many agencies and prospective adopters would like to think. Thank you putting yourself out there and attempting to explain again what is wrong with adoption - specifically domestic infant adoptions (the field you and speak from only from different “sides”).
Dawn
February 24th, 2008 at 9:38 am
And Suz, I don’t even have funnybones to offer and yet you fraternize! (Your check is in the mail!)
T
February 24th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Ah, the black and white thinking. Wish I could still do that instead of negotiating the myriad of gray in between. Thanks again for your articulate addressing of the same old stuff.
chanie
February 25th, 2008 at 1:24 am
impressive that you have the patience to go through this. i think that’s what makes you effective, and why you need to write the book!
i do think the compassion and understanding are much better ways to deal with priveledge than guilt is.
and the gray area is hard for some people to deal with, more complex, requires more subtle thinking. but ultimitely, more interesting, helpful, and true to life. i think anyway.
Amanda
February 25th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
I agree with you whole heartedly, Dawn and I love the way you can say something so serious, and so necessary (over and over and over again) in the voice you use.
I do disagree slightly with the guilt thing… most of the middle-upper class white people I know could do with a sprinkling of white guilt in their lives - as it is, there are too many who are too freakin oblivious to their privelage.
And this?
As a person with a vagina, I have a particular interest in the systemic ways we punish women for being women.
This is one of my favorite sentences. EVER.