<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I will not watch I will not watch I will not watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/</link>
	<description>writing, mothering, writing about mothering</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Plain Jane Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Plain Jane Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=1033#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the old "the children are the future" argument. It is a convenient way to gloss over difficult problems. Like making up your own laws!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the old &#8220;the children are the future&#8221; argument. It is a convenient way to gloss over difficult problems. Like making up your own laws!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margie</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/#comment-3411</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=1033#comment-3411</guid>
		<description>One of the many things that concern me about Madonna's comments is that they come from a person who has clearly put little thought into adoption generally.  It seems to me that for her, this is all about altruism, and not at all about adoption.  Such a skewed perspective, and wrong in so many ways.

The foundation of all intercountry adoption is the same, I think.  There may be more focus on adoption and adoption issues, but altruism is the foundation.  So I'm a little uncomfortable being too critical, because to some degree the same things could be said about me as are being said about her - we both adopted to give a child a better life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many things that concern me about Madonna&#8217;s comments is that they come from a person who has clearly put little thought into adoption generally.  It seems to me that for her, this is all about altruism, and not at all about adoption.  Such a skewed perspective, and wrong in so many ways.</p>
<p>The foundation of all intercountry adoption is the same, I think.  There may be more focus on adoption and adoption issues, but altruism is the foundation.  So I&#8217;m a little uncomfortable being too critical, because to some degree the same things could be said about me as are being said about her - we both adopted to give a child a better life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/#comment-3410</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=1033#comment-3410</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I wanted to add...I get that Madonna is the more famous in the relationship but it is kind of pissing me off that no one is really calling out Guy Richie in all this. He is also adopting this boy but somehow all the critisism has fallen on Madonna. That doesn't seem fair to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I wanted to add&#8230;I get that Madonna is the more famous in the relationship but it is kind of pissing me off that no one is really calling out Guy Richie in all this. He is also adopting this boy but somehow all the critisism has fallen on Madonna. That doesn&#8217;t seem fair to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/#comment-3409</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=1033#comment-3409</guid>
		<description>Saying that foreign adoption is the answer for the millions of African AIDS orphans is sort of like saying that playing the lottery is the answer to large scale American poverty. It just isn't a realistic or advisable large-scale solution.

I can understand that urge of being in a country where there is so much suffering, falling in love with a child and wanting to take him away from all that. I get that. I have felt that urge myself while visiting third world countries and while volunteering with AIDS orphans in the US.

But I think the issue with someone like Madonna (and anyone really who has too much money) is that no one challenges her on a personal level. And when they do she can't even sit there and acknowledge that there might be a reason why people are upset. It is all self righteous anger that everyone else is hurting the children of Africa even more by just saying that maybe international adoption wasn't the best solution for this boy and questioning weather maybe there was a way to allow him to return to the family he had.  They did not, from what I understand, place him in an orphanage because they didn't love him but because they couldn't feed him. There was no acknowledgement on her part of the place that money played in this adoption. I do not think that at this point returning that boy to the orphanage would be the right thing to do. I actually hope she gets to keep him since it appears that his father has chosen not to attempt to block the adoption. I hope she makes good on her promise to return to Malawi often, have an open adoption and keep this boy in contact with his existing family. But I really hope that even if she didn't acknowledge it on Oprah, she has given the implications of her decision a little bit more thought.

But as upsetting as it must be for families who have adopted internationally through proper, legitimate, legal channels I am kind of glad this has taken some of the issues involved with intercountry adoption and blown them up on such a grand scale. On some level I feel bad for her. She really isn't different that different from any other clueless adoptive family out there (and we know there are many) except that she has millions of dollars, a faux British accent and a national platform on Oprah instead of an Ebay fundraising sight and a ladybug infested webpage that plays midi versions of Ã¢â‚¬Å“Jesus Loves MeÃ¢â‚¬Â incessantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that foreign adoption is the answer for the millions of African AIDS orphans is sort of like saying that playing the lottery is the answer to large scale American poverty. It just isn&#8217;t a realistic or advisable large-scale solution.</p>
<p>I can understand that urge of being in a country where there is so much suffering, falling in love with a child and wanting to take him away from all that. I get that. I have felt that urge myself while visiting third world countries and while volunteering with AIDS orphans in the US.</p>
<p>But I think the issue with someone like Madonna (and anyone really who has too much money) is that no one challenges her on a personal level. And when they do she can&#8217;t even sit there and acknowledge that there might be a reason why people are upset. It is all self righteous anger that everyone else is hurting the children of Africa even more by just saying that maybe international adoption wasn&#8217;t the best solution for this boy and questioning weather maybe there was a way to allow him to return to the family he had.  They did not, from what I understand, place him in an orphanage because they didn&#8217;t love him but because they couldn&#8217;t feed him. There was no acknowledgement on her part of the place that money played in this adoption. I do not think that at this point returning that boy to the orphanage would be the right thing to do. I actually hope she gets to keep him since it appears that his father has chosen not to attempt to block the adoption. I hope she makes good on her promise to return to Malawi often, have an open adoption and keep this boy in contact with his existing family. But I really hope that even if she didn&#8217;t acknowledge it on Oprah, she has given the implications of her decision a little bit more thought.</p>
<p>But as upsetting as it must be for families who have adopted internationally through proper, legitimate, legal channels I am kind of glad this has taken some of the issues involved with intercountry adoption and blown them up on such a grand scale. On some level I feel bad for her. She really isn&#8217;t different that different from any other clueless adoptive family out there (and we know there are many) except that she has millions of dollars, a faux British accent and a national platform on Oprah instead of an Ebay fundraising sight and a ladybug infested webpage that plays midi versions of Ã¢â‚¬Å“Jesus Loves MeÃ¢â‚¬Â incessantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2006/10/25/i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch-i-will-not-watch/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=1033#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>On your points about Madonna, I totally agree.  She's always struck me as a pseudo-intellectual, making statements and taking action without really considering all sides of the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your points about Madonna, I totally agree.  She&#8217;s always struck me as a pseudo-intellectual, making statements and taking action without really considering all sides of the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
