counter easy hit

I actually wanted to write about outlining

But instead I’m going to write more about adoption.

Kathleen wrote:

I take issue with the idea that a refusal to sign adoption papers is the same as “deciding to parent.” My view is no doubt colored by working in family court. However, the idea that all parents who choose not to go through with adoptions go onto to actually parent the child is patently false.

My bias is to assume the best intent of families making adoption plans (not being forced to make adoption plans or else lose their children to social services). There are individual stories about terrible people who make adoption plans who do not follow through and then are abusive or hateful of use the children to manipulate partners, etc. There are also individual stories about adoptive parents who are abusive or hateful or use the children to manipulate partners. But we make policy on the most common scenarios and most commonly, people are pretty good.

Some of the antiadoption activists make a point of collecting stories about adopters who kill and obviously, this is an argument full of holes. There are many reasons to criticize adoption but pulling out stories of abusive adopters isn’t all that convicing to this (not abusive) adopter. Likewise circulating stories about terrible almost-birth parents doesn’t convince me that every adoption that doesn’t happen is a tragedy.

There are general truths about adoption and then there are specific truths about every individual adoption. Parents who consider adoption are given the same rights as parents NOT considering adoption. That means that some parents (who considered adoption or not) are going to be awesome and amazing and that some parents (who considered adoption or not) are going to be bloody awful.

Wendy asked (on the livejournal post), “How saintly can we be? I mean really? (we being adoptive parents) At some point isn’t there an “okay enough fucking with us, really now, get your shit together now” moment?”

We don’t have to be saints. We can rant, rave, feel bitter, hate the parents who chose to parent and weep for the baby that isn’t ours. Like I said, we can feel however we want to feel but we can’t dictate policy on the feelings of a few. That’s just the reality. That’s just what it is to adopt. And that’s also why we need the support of ethical adoption professionals who will help guide us when we are at our most fragile.

And yes, absolutely there can come a point where people can say, “Enough of this — make your decision or don’t.” The desperation that we can feel when we’re waiting to adopt can sometimes make us say yes to situations that aren’t working for us. Again, an ethical adoption professional can be a guide there; they can encourage you to say no. (I am amazed by the number of hopeful adoptive parents who are put out to sea by agencies and lawyers who shrug and say, “Well, hang in there. You never know what might happen.” That’s bullshit.)

I have learned more about the situation I was blogging about before (Cecily put it out there so I feel comfortable linking now) and it really is a truly shitty situation. But knowing how shitty it is doesn’t change how I feel about making generalizations. It says a lot about this almost adoption but not much about adoption in general. (I’m really wondering about the agency/lawyer here. I think they dropped the ball but don’t know for certain.)

Possibly related posts

No Responses to “I actually wanted to write about outlining”

  1. Ally Says:

    If this is a shitty situation, then that’s what it is, A shitty situation. And while I am very sorry for the people involved, you’re right. It’s not the situation to make policy on or the situation to prove a point. It just is. And this: “There are general truths about adoption and then there are specific truths about every individual adoption. Parents who consider adoption are given the same rights as parents NOT considering adoption. That means that some parents (who considered adoption or not) are going to be awesome and amazing and that some parents (who considered adoption or not) are going to be bloody awful.” Yes. Exactly. I really hate the idea that just because a parent has considered adoption, it automatically puts them in a box, and the only way out with some dignity is to go through with the adoption.


  2. Kathleen Says:

    I agree with you that laws and such should not be set by these wrenching situations.

    However, I do think there should be room for people to be honest about how they feel without being shamed for it.


  3. cloudscome Says:

    Type your comment here.


  4. cloudscome Says:

    Maybe this is changing the subject, but did I miss the part of the conversation where we talked about the possiblity that there is a father here who stepped up? Hypothetically, I mean, because we don’t know the acutal situation over at Cecily’s blog, but fathers usually get slammed for disappearing . Here is one who said no I’m not signing away my rights - I’m the baby’s father. Leaving aside the possiblity that he is scum, it’s kinda nice to hear a father saying that. I can say this because I wanted to hate my baby’s father and I didn’t go through with an adoption because he refused to agree to it. So in a weird twist of grace I got to raise my son because he was such a stubbonr bastard. Sometimes it works out like that and it’s a good thing. Grace being the opperative word.


  5. Lisa V Says:

    Cecily and Dawn have both said this situation with this particular father is less than ideal, cloudscome. However, we still need to protect the rights of the many, and not just trample them because of a few.


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>