<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Marry the slackers&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/</link>
	<description>dawn friedman's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teller for the last time</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller for the last time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=822#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>And oh my god this woman is ugly.
No wonder she needs power and money... talk about compensating.


&lt;a href="http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/history/hirshman.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/history/hirshman.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And oh my god this woman is ugly.<br />
No wonder she needs power and money&#8230; talk about compensating.</p>
<p><a href="http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/history/hirshman.asp" rel="nofollow">http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/history/hirshman.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller AGAIN</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller AGAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=822#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>"Will there never again be more than one woman on the Supreme Court?"

How about an unemployed HOBO in the supreme court?

I thought the idea was to represent the people?
How about 50% women 50% men, then of thoose a very few super rich, the middle income people (big group) and then the low income and uneducated (BIG group)... how about letting THOOSE into the supreme court?


How about you being a hypocrite... Equality clearly shouldnt be considered for all cases and all people right? Hobos in the supreme court.. clearly not....
No.. just white, rich bitches like you I presume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will there never again be more than one woman on the Supreme Court?&#8221;</p>
<p>How about an unemployed HOBO in the supreme court?</p>
<p>I thought the idea was to represent the people?<br />
How about 50% women 50% men, then of thoose a very few super rich, the middle income people (big group) and then the low income and uneducated (BIG group)&#8230; how about letting THOOSE into the supreme court?</p>
<p>How about you being a hypocrite&#8230; Equality clearly shouldnt be considered for all cases and all people right? Hobos in the supreme court.. clearly not&#8230;.<br />
No.. just white, rich bitches like you I presume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller again</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=822#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>She sure provides a good guide for women to be able to pursue a career in todays world, but offers LITTLE of value to true equality.
She even has suggestions on how to marry poorer or dependant people to have them act as "househelp" easier.

Clearly this woman has not one IDEA about what equality between the sexes mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She sure provides a good guide for women to be able to pursue a career in todays world, but offers LITTLE of value to true equality.<br />
She even has suggestions on how to marry poorer or dependant people to have them act as &#8220;househelp&#8221; easier.</p>
<p>Clearly this woman has not one IDEA about what equality between the sexes mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penn, but I am Teller</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Penn, but I am Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=822#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>Omg.. talk about being a hypocrite.
The schools should teach ALL PEOPLE regardless of SEX the same things. Thats what equality is all about. This woman is only about being PRO woman.

Making lots of hypocritical statements throughout her entire "speech" kinda makes me doubt her understanding of the word feminism. It actually has nothing to do with ONLY women as the name might lead you to believe.

From dictionary.com
"Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes."

Personally I assign whatever I feel like to whomever. This doesnt mean that ANY woman has to comply with what I might or ANYONE might think. IT STILL ALL BOILS DOWN TO CHOICE.
YOU CHOOSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omg.. talk about being a hypocrite.<br />
The schools should teach ALL PEOPLE regardless of SEX the same things. Thats what equality is all about. This woman is only about being PRO woman.</p>
<p>Making lots of hypocritical statements throughout her entire &#8220;speech&#8221; kinda makes me doubt her understanding of the word feminism. It actually has nothing to do with ONLY women as the name might lead you to believe.</p>
<p>From dictionary.com<br />
&#8220;Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally I assign whatever I feel like to whomever. This doesnt mean that ANY woman has to comply with what I might or ANYONE might think. IT STILL ALL BOILS DOWN TO CHOICE.<br />
YOU CHOOSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/12/02/marry-the-slackers/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=822#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>So how does a lesbian giving up an academic career to parent while her partner brings home very feminist bacon from the Women's Studies Department fit into this b.s. paradigm anyway?  Where's the patriarchy I'm giving into?  The man who robbed me of my potential?  Hirshman's critique is just way, way too simplistic on so many fronts.

Good talk-back, Dawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does a lesbian giving up an academic career to parent while her partner brings home very feminist bacon from the Women&#8217;s Studies Department fit into this b.s. paradigm anyway?  Where&#8217;s the patriarchy I&#8217;m giving into?  The man who robbed me of my potential?  Hirshman&#8217;s critique is just way, way too simplistic on so many fronts.</p>
<p>Good talk-back, Dawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
