<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh jeez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/</link>
	<description>dawn friedman's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: akeeyu</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>akeeyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=632#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>J, you kind of ARE missing the point.  First of all, there is a huge difference between a child that has been institutionalized for three years and a one year old.

Second, Soper pointed out that she was only approved to bring home a child under a year old, so even if they wanted to take the three year old, they wouldn't have been able to bring her back into the United States, which kind of defeates the point of adoption for all involved parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J, you kind of ARE missing the point.  First of all, there is a huge difference between a child that has been institutionalized for three years and a one year old.</p>
<p>Second, Soper pointed out that she was only approved to bring home a child under a year old, so even if they wanted to take the three year old, they wouldn&#8217;t have been able to bring her back into the United States, which kind of defeates the point of adoption for all involved parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=632#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Why don't they take the three year old? Can they not change the visa/paperwork? Why is it so terrible to get a three year old instead of a one year old? They are lucky to be able to go to a country and come back with a child or am I missing the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they take the three year old? Can they not change the visa/paperwork? Why is it so terrible to get a three year old instead of a one year old? They are lucky to be able to go to a country and come back with a child or am I missing the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=632#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>Boy does that ever suck.
Awful awful awful.
Poor thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy does that ever suck.<br />
Awful awful awful.<br />
Poor thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marie</title>
		<link>http://www.thiswomanswork.com/2005/08/01/oh-jeez/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thiswomanswork.com/?p=632#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Any way to syndicate her site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way to syndicate her site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
